Justice on a Permission Slip: Malta’s Chief Justice Fiasco
This isn’t just a tiff between a judge and a Prime Minister. It’s the moment you lift the bonnet on Malta’s justice system and realise half the engine is held together with cable ties and hope. The way we pick a Chief Justice isn’t just flawed. It’s a joke. We pretend that the two-thirds rule in Parliament protects the courts from politics. Lovely. In theory, it forces agreement. In reality, it’s two tribes in suits haggling over which candidate will upset them slightly less. Not a wise choice. A least‑worst option. The noble language of “constitutional independence” quietly mutates into “Who can we live with without choking?” But a Chief Justice is not a flatmate. They’re not someone the parties merely tolerate. They should be someone the Republic actually trusts. When people start hearing that candidates are weighed by party reaction, TV optics, and internal loyalty charts, the problem isn’t the gossip. The problem is the wiring. The system is built so politics gets first dibs and ...